Recent posts

Johnson & Johnson remember and remove Talc-based baby powder

February 24, 2022 0 Comments


In an effort to avoid the impact of his recent lawsuit against the company, Johnson & J has remembered and removed all Talc-based baby powder from the market. Although Talc-based baby powder is still widely available, the company has never been very transparent about the testing procedure. According to a report published by the New York Times in 1975, J & J failed to reveal that five of the 17 tested samples had asbestos in it. This study found that the Talk Mine from which baby powder was sourced was a source of powder.


Following findings, the company has stopped selling Talc-based baby powder in the United States and Canada. The company continues to sell products in other markets, including the UK. But baby powder called back is still available in several international markets, and the company is currently investigating the situation. In the end, his decision is a consumer safety problem and the right choice for health.


Asbestos are dangerous for babies and adults. Apart from the risk of asbestos, it is not clear whether J & J products are safe to use today. The company attracted a recent verdict in many cases and was awarded $ 4.7 billion in compensation from 22 women. Recent settlement is another example of brand disability. The company faces a lawsuit that has never happened beforehand from a mother in Connecticut.


However, Johnson & Johnson Recalls and Removes Talc-Based BabyPowder have a mixed legal history, and the latest lawsuit has caused a $ 4.7 billion jury award in damage to 22 women. Apart from this decent assessment, the company has won many of these cases and appealed almost everything. Whereas f.d.a. Recommend that consumers stop using Talc-based baby powder from polluted lots.


In the US and Canada, Johnson & J continue to sell Talc-based baby powder. The company has steadily defended powder-based baby powder safety. However, his legal strategy seems not as successful as FDA. Lawsuits submitted against J & J are mostly motivated by the fact that the company is aware of the risk of asbestos contamination, but it does not focus on preventing the sale of products in the United States.


Although there is evidence of installation that Talc-based baby powder is dangerous, the company continues to deny the dangers caused. A jury was awarded a $ 117 million man, claiming that Johnson-based Talc baby powder had caused his mesothelioma. Likewise, a man in New Jersey was awarded award more than $ 117 million after he claimed that he developed Mesothelioma from using the same baby powder.

Some say he’s half man half fish, others say he’s more of a seventy/thirty split. Either way he’s a fishy bastard.

0 comments: